Kang, S. K., & Inzlicht, M. (2014). Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 452-456.
Viewing entries tagged
stigma
Kang, S. K., & Inzlicht, M. (2014). Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 452-456.
Kang, S. K., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 357-369.
Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2012). In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.).Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (pp. 3-14). New York: Oxford University Press.
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A., & Gutsell, J. N. (2012). In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.). Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (pp. 107-123). New York: Oxford University Press.
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., Legault, L., & Kang, S. K. (2011). Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 227-256.
Inzlicht, M. & Kang, S. K. (2010). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 467-481.
Johns, M., Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2008). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 691-705.
Derks, B., Inzlicht, M., & Kang, S. (2008). Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 163-181.
Inzlicht, M., McKay, L., & Aronson, J. (2006). Psychological Science, 17, 262-269.
Inzlicht, M., Aronson, J., Good, C., & McKay, L. (2006). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 323-336.
Inzlicht, M. & Good, C. (2006). In S. Levin & C. van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and Group Inequality: Social Psychological Approaches (pp. 129-150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ben-Zeev, T., Fein, S., & Inzlicht, M. (2005). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 174-181.
Ben-Zeev, T., Carrasquillo C. M, Ching, A., Kliengklom, T. J., McDonald, K. L, Newhall, D. C., Patton, G. E., Stewart, T. D., Stoddard, T, Inzlicht, M., & Fein, S. (2005). In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender Differences in Mathematics (pp. 189-206). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Aronson, J. & Inzlicht, M. (2004). Psychological Science, 15, 829-836.
Inzlicht, M. & Ben-Zeev, T. (2003). Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 796-805.
Inzlicht, M. & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). Psychological Science, 11, 365-371.
In an essay published in the Conversation, Daryl Cameron, Michael Inzlicht, and William Cunningham discuss the nature of empathy, specifically asking if empathy has limits. In the essay, which is part book review of Paul Bloom's Against Empathy, Michael and his co-authors suggest that limits to empathy are more apparent than real; these apparent limits are not built into empathy itself, but reflect the choices we make. These so-called limits, in other words, result from general trade-offs that people make as they balance some goals against others.
Harvard Business Review discusses the changing landscape of research on self-control, including covering work by Michael Inzlicht, who suggests that self-control is not similar to a fuel tank that becomes emptied with use. Instead, Michael suggests that self-control is better understood as a motivational construct, with features that make it resemble an emotion.
Commenting in the News and Views section of Nature Human Behaviour, Michael Inzlicht and Cendri A. Hutcherson comment on a brilliant new paper on prosocial apathy, noting its many strengths, but also areas for future inquiry.
Read Commentary Here