The Work and Play Lab explores the science of mental effort and leisure

The Work and Play Lab is serious about mental and physical effort, but also about leisure and rest. The lab is primarily focused on understanding the nature of effort, how people push themselves to reach their goals. This has led to an emphasis on the psychology of self-control and the related concepts of cognitive control and executive function. For example, work in the lab has examined how self-control wanes over the course of a day as fatigue and boredom set in. It has also examined an unappreciated aspect of empathy: that empathy requires effort, and as such is often avoided.

Inspired by the philosopher Josef Pieper who said that work is the means of life; leisure the end, the lab has started focusing on how people spend their free time and the consequences of these choices. For example, work in the lab is examining why and how people use Twitter, and some of the consequences of this use for wellbeing and political polarization. Work in the lab has also examined the joys of empathy—when people celebrate and resonate with others’achievements. Current projects on leisure also include questions about recreational cannabis use and the downsides of people treating their work as leisure.

In the past, the lab also conducted research on prejudice and discrimination, especially at they impact academic performance. Also noteworthy is the lab’s commitment to open and transparent science, which among other things includes regularly running replication studies.

What follows are questions that have guided the lab’s research and representative publications that address these questions.


Self-Control

Why is self-control so hard? Is self-control a limited resource? Does self-control help people reach their goals? What strategies do people use to control themselves? Is ego depletion real?

self-control.jpg

Inzlicht, M., Werner, K.M., Briskin, J.L., & Roberts, B.W. (2021). Integrating models of self-regulation. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 319-345.

Milyavskaya, M., Saunders, B., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). Self-control in daily life: Prevalence and effectiveness of diverse self-control strategies. Journal of Personality, 89, 634-651.

Saunders, B., Milyavskaya, M., & Inzlicht, M. (2022). Longitudinal evidence that Event Related Potential measures of self-regulation do not predict everyday goal pursuit. Nature Communications, 13, 3201.

Milyavskaya, M., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). What’s so great about self-control? Examining the importance of effortful self-control and temptation in predicting real-life depletion and goal attainment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 603-611.


Empathy

Is empathy hard work? Can AI express empathy well? Are doctors especially empathic? Does empathy feel good? Do people readily share in other’s good fortunes?

Cameron, C.D., Hutcherson, C.A., Ferguson, A.M., Scheffer, J.A., Hadjiandreou, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2019). Empathy is hard work: People choose to avoid empathy because of its cognitive costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 962-976.

Inzlicht, M., Cameron, C.D., D’Cruz, J., Bloom, P. (2024). In praise of empathic AI. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28, 89-91.

Ferguson, A.M., Cameron, C.D., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). When does empathy feel good? Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39, 125-129.

Depow, G.J., Francis, Z.L., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). The experience of empathy in everyday life. Psychological Science, 32, 1198-1213.


Effort

Do people avoid mental effort? Do people find effort meaningful? Is exerting effort boring? Can people be taught to value hard work? Do people prefer effort over doing nothing?

effort.jpg

Inzlicht, M., Shenhav, A., & Olivola, C.Y. (2018). The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 337-349.

Milyavskaya, M., Inzlicht, M., Johnson, T., & Larson, M.J. (2019). Reward sensitivity following boredom and cognitive effort: A high-powered neurophysiological investigation. Neuropsychologia, 123, 159-168.

Wu, R, Ferguson, A.M., & Inzlicht, M. (2023). Do humans prefer cognitive effort over doing nothing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152, 1069-1079.

Lin, H., Westbrook, A., Fan, F., & Inzlicht, M. (2024). An experimental manipulation of the value of effort. Nature Human Behaviour.


Leisure Time

Why doe people use social media and how does it make them feel? Does cannabis make people lazy and unmotivated? Why do we find smartphones so addictive? What kinds of leisure promote wellbeing and a sense of meaning and purpose?

Oldemburgo de Mello, V., Cheung, F., & Inzlicht, M. (2024). Twitter (X) use predicts substantial changes in well-being, polarization, sense of belonging, and outrage. Communications Psychology, 2, 15.

Inzlicht, M., Sparrow-Mungal, T. B., & Depow, G. J. (2024). Chronic cannabis use in everyday life: Emotional, motivational, and self-regulatory effects of frequently getting high. Social Psychology and Personality Science.

Lyngs, U., Lukoff, K., Slovak, P., Inzlicht, M., Freed, M., Andrews, H., Tinsman, C., Csuka, L., Alberts, L., Oldemburgo de Mello, V., Makransky, G., Hornbæk, K., Van Kleek, M., & Shadbolt, N. (2024). “I finally felt I had the tools to control these urges”: Empowering students to achieve their device use goals with the Reduce Digital Distraction Workshop. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24), May 11–16, 2024, Honolulu, HI, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA. 

leisure-time.jpg

Prejudice & Discrimination

Why are women under-represented in math and science? Can negative stereotypes undermine academic performance? Can anti-racism interventions ironically increase prejudice?

prejudice-discrimination.jpg

Inzlicht, M. & Schmader, T. (2012). Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application. New York: Oxford University Press. 

Inzlicht, M. & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365-371.

Legault, L., Gutsell, J.N., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Ironic effects of anti-prejudice messages: How motivational intervention reduces (but also increases) prejudice. Psychological Science, 22, 1472–1477.


Open Science

Is the well-known ego depletion effect replicable? How does social psychology move on from decades of questionable research practices? Are self-replications valuable? Why are meta-analyses problematic?

Inzlicht, M., & Friese, M. (2019). The past, present, and future of ego depletion. Social Psychology, 50, 370-378.

Inzlicht, M. (2016, February 29) Reckoning with the Past [blog post]. Getting Better.

Dang, J., King, K.M., & Inzlicht, M. (2020). Why are self-report and behavioral measures weakly correlated? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 267-269.

Saunders, B., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). Pooling resources to enhance rigour in psychophysiological research: Insights from open science approaches to meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 162, 112-120.

open-science.jpg