- CBC Radio Toronto, Metro Morning
December 30, 2014
Viewing entries in
2014
- CBC Radio Toronto, Metro Morning
December 30, 2014
- Québec Science
December 2014
- New Republic
October 19, 2014
- Scholar’s Circle
September 20, 2014
- The New York Times
July 25, 2014
- CJOB 680 AM Winnipeg
June 2014
- The Globe and Mail
April 18, 2014
- WAMC Northeast Public Radio
April 7, 2014
- U of T Magazine
April 2014
- The Underground (UTSC student newspaper)
April 2014
- UTSC Commons
April 2014
- CTV News Toronto
March 2014
- Fast Company
February 21, 2014
- De Volkskrant (Netherlands)
February 8, 2014
- The Globe and Mail
February 4, 2014
- Medical News Today
January 19, 2014
- The Huffington Post
January 17, 2014
- Women’s Health
January 17, 2014
- Business Standard
January 16, 2014
- Global News
January 15, 2014
University of Toronto professor Michael Inzlicht wanted to find out who's better at empathic responses: people, or ChatGPT. He explains to CBC Metro Morning how AI won the empathy contest.
A 28-year-old woman with a busy social life spends hours on end talking to her A.I. boyfriend for advice and consolation. And yes, they do have sex.
Michael Inzlicht, a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, said people were more willing to share private information with a bot than with a human being. Generative A.I. chatbots, in turn, respond more empathetically than humans do. In a recent study, he found that ChatGPT’s responses were more compassionate than those from crisis line responders, who are experts in empathy. He said that a relationship with an A.I. companion could be beneficial, but that the long-term effects needed to be studied.
“If we become habituated to endless empathy and we downgrade our real friendships, and that’s contributing to loneliness — the very thing we’re trying to solve — that’s a real potential problem,” he said.
Read More
Why do people enjoy doing difficult things?
“You can imagine that some people are willing to work hard, but go about it from a sense of duty and responsibility,” Inzlicht told me for my New York Times story. “But other people—call them ‘joyful workers’—this is what they live for. This is what gives them purpose. This is what makes them feel important. This is what helps them make the world make sense.” The existence of “joyful workers” suggests that, even if the Effort Paradox applies to everyone, it doesn’t apply equally. Where you sit on the Meaningfulness-of-Effort scale probably reflects a changeable mix of nature and nurture.
Read More Here