The Work and Play Lab explores the science of mental effort and leisure
The Work and Play Lab is serious about mental and physical effort, but also about leisure and rest. The lab is primarily focused on understanding the nature of effort, how people push themselves to reach their goals. This has led to an emphasis on the psychology of self-control and the related concepts of cognitive control and executive function. For example, work in the lab has examined how self-control wanes over the course of a day as fatigue and boredom set in. It has also examined an unappreciated aspect of empathy: that empathy requires effort, and as such is often avoided.
Inspired by the philosopher Josef Pieper who said that work is the means of life; leisure the end, the lab has started focusing on how people spend their free time and the consequences of these choices. For example, work in the lab is examining why and how people use Twitter, and some of the consequences of this use for wellbeing and political polarization. Work in the lab has also examined the joys of empathy—when people celebrate and resonate with others’achievements. Current projects on leisure also include questions about recreational cannabis use and the downsides of people treating their work as leisure.
In the past, the lab also conducted research on prejudice and discrimination, especially at they impact academic performance. Also noteworthy is the lab’s commitment to open and transparent science, which among other things includes regularly running replication studies.
What follows are questions that have guided the lab’s research and representative publications that address these questions.
Self-Control
Why is self-control so hard? Is self-control a limited resource? Does self-control help people reach their goals? What strategies do people use to control themselves? Is ego depletion real?
Inzlicht, M., & Roberts, B.W. (2024). The fable of state self-control. Current Opinion in Psychology, 58, 101848.
Inzlicht, M., Werner, K.M., Briskin, J.L., & Roberts, B.W. (2021). Integrating models of self-regulation. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 319-345.
Saunders, B., Milyavskaya, M., & Inzlicht, M. (2022). Longitudinal evidence that Event Related Potential measures of self-regulation do not predict everyday goal pursuit. Nature Communications, 13, 3201.
Milyavskaya, M., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). What’s so great about self-control? Examining the importance of effortful self-control and temptation in predicting real-life depletion and goal attainment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 603-611.
Empathy
Is empathy hard work? Can AI express empathy well? Are doctors especially empathic? Does empathy feel good? Do people readily share in other’s good fortunes?
Cameron, C.D., Hutcherson, C.A., Ferguson, A.M., Scheffer, J.A., Hadjiandreou, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2019). Empathy is hard work: People choose to avoid empathy because of its cognitive costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 962-976.
Inzlicht, M., Cameron, C.D., D’Cruz, J., Bloom, P. (2024). In praise of empathic AI. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28, 89-91.
Ferguson, A.M., Cameron, C.D., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). When does empathy feel good? Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39, 125-129.
Depow, G.J., Francis, Z.L., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). The experience of empathy in everyday life. Psychological Science, 32, 1198-1213.
Effort
Do people avoid mental effort? Do people find effort meaningful? Is exerting effort boring? Can people be taught to value hard work? Do people prefer effort over doing nothing?
Inzlicht, M., Shenhav, A., & Olivola, C.Y. (2018). The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 337-349.
Milyavskaya, M., Inzlicht, M., Johnson, T., & Larson, M.J. (2019). Reward sensitivity following boredom and cognitive effort: A high-powered neurophysiological investigation. Neuropsychologia, 123, 159-168.
Wu, R, Ferguson, A.M., & Inzlicht, M. (2023). Do humans prefer cognitive effort over doing nothing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152, 1069-1079.
Lin, H., Westbrook, A., Fan, F., & Inzlicht, M. (2024). An experimental manipulation of the value of effort. Nature Human Behaviour.
Leisure Time
Why doe people use social media and how does it make them feel? Does cannabis make people lazy and unmotivated? Why do we find smartphones so addictive? What kinds of leisure promote wellbeing and a sense of meaning and purpose?
Oldemburgo de Mello, V., Cheung, F., & Inzlicht, M. (2024). Twitter (X) use predicts substantial changes in well-being, polarization, sense of belonging, and outrage. Communications Psychology, 2, 15.
Inzlicht, M., Sparrow-Mungal, T. B., & Depow, G. J. (2024). Chronic cannabis use in everyday life: Emotional, motivational, and self-regulatory effects of frequently getting high. Social Psychology and Personality Science.
Tam, K.Y.Y., & Inzlicht, M. (2024). Fast-forward to boredom: How switching behaviour on digital media makes people more bored. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
Prejudice & Discrimination
Why are women under-represented in math and science? Can negative stereotypes undermine academic performance? Can anti-racism interventions ironically increase prejudice?
Inzlicht, M. & Schmader, T. (2012). Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application. New York: Oxford University Press.
Inzlicht, M. & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365-371.
Legault, L., Gutsell, J.N., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Ironic effects of anti-prejudice messages: How motivational intervention reduces (but also increases) prejudice. Psychological Science, 22, 1472–1477.
Open Science
Is the well-known ego depletion effect replicable? How does social psychology move on from decades of questionable research practices? Are self-replications valuable? Why are meta-analyses problematic?
Inzlicht, M., & Friese, M. (2019). The past, present, and future of ego depletion. Social Psychology, 50, 370-378.
Inzlicht, M. (2016, February 29) Reckoning with the Past [blog post]. Getting Better.
Dang, J., King, K.M., & Inzlicht, M. (2020). Why are self-report and behavioral measures weakly correlated? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 267-269.
Saunders, B., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). Pooling resources to enhance rigour in psychophysiological research: Insights from open science approaches to meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 162, 112-120.
Filter By Keyword
- neuroscience
- self-control
- emotion
- ego depletion
- motivation
- cognitive control
- ERN
- anterior cingulate cortex
- prejudice
- effort
- stigma
- empathy
- stereotype threat
- replication
- meaning
- self-regulation
- uncertainty
- decision making
- meta science
- religion
- education
- experience sampling
- morality
- acceptance
- fatigue
- cognitive dissonance
- mindfulness
- political psychology
- emotion regulation
- prosociality
Latest Tweets
News
…This isn’t a relic of a bygone era. The idea that marijuana makes you lazy has been a recurring theme in anti-drug campaigns and remains a widely held belief. Many people still view cannabis users as unmotivated slackers, content to waste their days in a haze of smoke. But is this really true? According to recent research published in Social Psychological and Personality Science, it may be little more than a myth.
Researchers conducted experiments to investigate the psychological effects of flicking by and fast-forwarding through online videos during moments of downtime
Scrolling through videos on TikTok or YouTube to avert boredom may have a decidedly unintended consequence: It can make people feel more bored, according to the paradoxical findings of a recent study published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. People seem increasingly intolerant of it, and Michael Inzlicht has a counterintuitive tip for avoiding boredom: Lean into it. Sit with the discomfort of boredom for a bit before flitting to something else. “If we’re so addicted to escaping boredom, so intolerant of boredom, it would be like a foraging animal going tree to tree, but never searching long enough to see if it bears fruit,” Inzlicht said. “Eventually, that animal will die.”
Collaborators
- Joshua Aronson, New York University
- Avi Ben-Zeev, San Francisco State University
- Elliot Berkman, University of Oregon
- Kirk Brown, Virginia Commonwealth University
- Daryl Cameron, Penn State University
- Belle Derks, Utrecht University
- Jennifer Gutsell, Brandeis University
- Greg Hajcak, Florida State University
- Eddie Harmon-Jones, University of New South Wales
- Jacob Hirsh, University of Toronto
- Cendri Hutcherson, University of Toronto
- Sonia Kang, University of Toronto
- Michael Larson, Brigham Young University
- Lisa Legault, Clarkson University
- Ian McGregor, University of Waterloo
- Marina Milyavskaya, Carleton University
- Sukhvinder Obhi, McMaster University
- Liz Page-Gould, University of Toronto
- Travis Proulx, Cardiff University
- Blair Saunders, University of Dundee
- Brandon Schmeichel, Texas A&M University
- Zindel Segal, University of Toronto
- Alexa Tullett, University of Alabama
University of Toronto
Organizations
- Association for Psychological Science
- Canadian Psychological Association
- Canada Foundation for Innovation
- International Social Cognition Network
- International Society for Research on Emotion
- National Academy of Education
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Social and Affective Neuroscience Society
- Social Psychology Network
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
- Society for Personality and Social Psychology
- Society for Psychophysiological Research
- Spencer Foundation
Understanding the effort paradox can help you reshape your relationship to exertion so that you commit to those hard but truly meaningful activities
“On the one hand, effort is costly,” says Michael Inzlicht, a psychologist at the University of Toronto, Canada. “On the other hand, it looks like we tend to value those things that we exerted effort for.” In a seminal 2018 paper, he and his colleagues dubbed this apparent conflict the “effort paradox”. Since then, psychologists have been figuring out the origins of the effort paradox and why some of us struggle with tasks that others might find easy. What they are finding is offering fresh insights not only into how you can get off the couch and into your running shoes, but also how you can learn more effectively, better empathise with others and even cultivate a more meaningful life. “[It seems] that if we can become…
Read More