Kang, S. K., & Inzlicht, M. (2014). Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 452-456.
Viewing entries tagged
stigma
Kang, S. K., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 357-369.
Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2012). In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.).Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (pp. 3-14). New York: Oxford University Press.
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A., & Gutsell, J. N. (2012). In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.). Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (pp. 107-123). New York: Oxford University Press.
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., Legault, L., & Kang, S. K. (2011). Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 227-256.
Inzlicht, M. & Kang, S. K. (2010). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 467-481.
Johns, M., Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2008). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 691-705.
Derks, B., Inzlicht, M., & Kang, S. (2008). Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 163-181.
Inzlicht, M., McKay, L., & Aronson, J. (2006). Psychological Science, 17, 262-269.
Inzlicht, M., Aronson, J., Good, C., & McKay, L. (2006). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 323-336.
Inzlicht, M. & Good, C. (2006). In S. Levin & C. van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and Group Inequality: Social Psychological Approaches (pp. 129-150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ben-Zeev, T., Fein, S., & Inzlicht, M. (2005). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 174-181.
Ben-Zeev, T., Carrasquillo C. M, Ching, A., Kliengklom, T. J., McDonald, K. L, Newhall, D. C., Patton, G. E., Stewart, T. D., Stoddard, T, Inzlicht, M., & Fein, S. (2005). In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender Differences in Mathematics (pp. 189-206). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Aronson, J. & Inzlicht, M. (2004). Psychological Science, 15, 829-836.
Inzlicht, M. & Ben-Zeev, T. (2003). Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 796-805.
Inzlicht, M. & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). Psychological Science, 11, 365-371.
Filter By Keyword
- neuroscience
- self-control
- emotion
- motivation
- ego depletion
- effort
- cognitive control
- ERN
- anterior cingulate cortex
- prejudice
- empathy
- stigma
- meaning
- replication
- stereotype threat
- self-regulation
- experience sampling
- decision making
- meta science
- artificial intelligence
- uncertainty
- religion
- cognitive dissonance
- education
- fatigue
- morality
- acceptance
- prosociality
- mindfulness
- political psychology
News
Featured
When researchers asked people whether they’d rather get an empathetic response from a human or from AI, human responses won by a wide margin. When the same researchers actually showed them the responses, AI won by a wider one. People who said they preferred human responses rated the AI replies as more empathetic, more validating, and even better at making them feel heard.
The most recent evidence comes from a Penn State and University of Toronto team led by Joshua Wenger, published in January in Communications Psychology. Across four studies, participants were given the choice between receiving an empathetic response from a human or from ChatGPT. They picked humans 57% to 62% of the time.
A 10-year-old girl watches YouTube with a friend during their after-school program. An ad pops up. A two-minute quiz can tell her if she has ADHD. She takes it, of course. And just like that, she comes home to talk to her child psychiatrist dad about how she has ADHD.
This story is not unique. Mental health awareness has become one of Canada’s most visible public health projects. The messaging is everywhere: Bell Let’s Talk, school wellness e-mails, workplace campaigns, social media initiatives.
Yet despite these efforts, population-level mental health keeps declining. Medication use is increasing. How can this be?
Collaborators
- Joshua Aronson, New York University
- Avi Ben-Zeev, San Francisco State University
- Elliot Berkman, University of Oregon
- Kirk Brown, Virginia Commonwealth University
- Daryl Cameron, Penn State University
- Belle Derks, Utrecht University
- Jennifer Gutsell, Brandeis University
- Greg Hajcak, Florida State University
- Eddie Harmon-Jones, University of New South Wales
- Jacob Hirsh, University of Toronto
- Cendri Hutcherson, University of Toronto
- Sonia Kang, University of Toronto
- Michael Larson, Brigham Young University
- Lisa Legault, Clarkson University
- Ian McGregor, University of Waterloo
- Marina Milyavskaya, Carleton University
- Sukhvinder Obhi, McMaster University
- Liz Page-Gould, University of Toronto
- Travis Proulx, Cardiff University
- Blair Saunders, University of Dundee
- Brandon Schmeichel, Texas A&M University
- Zindel Segal, University of Toronto
- Alexa Tullett, University of Alabama
University of Toronto
Organizations
- Association for Psychological Science
- Canadian Psychological Association
- Canada Foundation for Innovation
- International Social Cognition Network
- International Society for Research on Emotion
- National Academy of Education
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Social and Affective Neuroscience Society
- Social Psychology Network
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
- Society for Personality and Social Psychology
- Society for Psychophysiological Research
- Spencer Foundation
Michael Inzlicht, a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto who studies self-control, has found that when people report deliberately using willpower, they succeed about half the time. When they do not report making that deliberate effort, they still succeed about one-third of the time.
Read More