Kang, S. K., & Inzlicht, M. (2014). Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 452-456.
Viewing entries tagged
stigma
Kang, S. K., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 357-369.
Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2012). In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.).Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (pp. 3-14). New York: Oxford University Press.
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A., & Gutsell, J. N. (2012). In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.). Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (pp. 107-123). New York: Oxford University Press.
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., Legault, L., & Kang, S. K. (2011). Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 227-256.
Inzlicht, M. & Kang, S. K. (2010). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 467-481.
Johns, M., Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2008). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 691-705.
Derks, B., Inzlicht, M., & Kang, S. (2008). Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 163-181.
Inzlicht, M., McKay, L., & Aronson, J. (2006). Psychological Science, 17, 262-269.
Inzlicht, M., Aronson, J., Good, C., & McKay, L. (2006). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 323-336.
Inzlicht, M. & Good, C. (2006). In S. Levin & C. van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and Group Inequality: Social Psychological Approaches (pp. 129-150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ben-Zeev, T., Fein, S., & Inzlicht, M. (2005). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 174-181.
Ben-Zeev, T., Carrasquillo C. M, Ching, A., Kliengklom, T. J., McDonald, K. L, Newhall, D. C., Patton, G. E., Stewart, T. D., Stoddard, T, Inzlicht, M., & Fein, S. (2005). In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender Differences in Mathematics (pp. 189-206). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Aronson, J. & Inzlicht, M. (2004). Psychological Science, 15, 829-836.
Inzlicht, M. & Ben-Zeev, T. (2003). Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 796-805.
Inzlicht, M. & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). Psychological Science, 11, 365-371.
Filter By Keyword
- neuroscience
- self-control
- emotion
- ego depletion
- motivation
- cognitive control
- ERN
- anterior cingulate cortex
- prejudice
- effort
- stigma
- empathy
- stereotype threat
- replication
- meaning
- self-regulation
- uncertainty
- decision making
- meta science
- religion
- education
- experience sampling
- morality
- acceptance
- fatigue
- cognitive dissonance
- mindfulness
- political psychology
- emotion regulation
- prosociality
Latest Tweets
News
Featured
Researchers conducted experiments to investigate the psychological effects of flicking by and fast-forwarding through online videos during moments of downtime
Scrolling through videos on TikTok or YouTube to avert boredom may have a decidedly unintended consequence: It can make people feel more bored, according to the paradoxical findings of a recent study published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. People seem increasingly intolerant of it, and Michael Inzlicht has a counterintuitive tip for avoiding boredom: Lean into it. Sit with the discomfort of boredom for a bit before flitting to something else. “If we’re so addicted to escaping boredom, so intolerant of boredom, it would be like a foraging animal going tree to tree, but never searching long enough to see if it bears fruit,” Inzlicht said. “Eventually, that animal will die.”
The struggle for self-control is real, and one many of us are familiar with - but is 'willpower' actually a myth? Psychology professor Michael Inzlicht has long been intrigued by how we curb our less desirable behaviours, and what it is that unites people with 'high self-control'. His research at the University of Toronto's Work and Play Lab also seeks to understand our complicated relationship with effort and empathy - and whether so-called 'empathetic AI' has a place in our future.
Collaborators
- Joshua Aronson, New York University
- Avi Ben-Zeev, San Francisco State University
- Elliot Berkman, University of Oregon
- Kirk Brown, Virginia Commonwealth University
- Daryl Cameron, Penn State University
- Belle Derks, Utrecht University
- Jennifer Gutsell, Brandeis University
- Greg Hajcak, Florida State University
- Eddie Harmon-Jones, University of New South Wales
- Jacob Hirsh, University of Toronto
- Cendri Hutcherson, University of Toronto
- Sonia Kang, University of Toronto
- Michael Larson, Brigham Young University
- Lisa Legault, Clarkson University
- Ian McGregor, University of Waterloo
- Marina Milyavskaya, Carleton University
- Sukhvinder Obhi, McMaster University
- Liz Page-Gould, University of Toronto
- Travis Proulx, Cardiff University
- Blair Saunders, University of Dundee
- Brandon Schmeichel, Texas A&M University
- Zindel Segal, University of Toronto
- Alexa Tullett, University of Alabama
University of Toronto
Organizations
- Association for Psychological Science
- Canadian Psychological Association
- Canada Foundation for Innovation
- International Social Cognition Network
- International Society for Research on Emotion
- National Academy of Education
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Social and Affective Neuroscience Society
- Social Psychology Network
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
- Society for Personality and Social Psychology
- Society for Psychophysiological Research
- Spencer Foundation
…This isn’t a relic of a bygone era. The idea that marijuana makes you lazy has been a recurring theme in anti-drug campaigns and remains a widely held belief. Many people still view cannabis users as unmotivated slackers, content to waste their days in a haze of smoke. But is this really true? According to recent research published in Social Psychological and Personality Science, it may be little more than a myth.
Read Here