Fusco, G., Scandola, M., Lin, H., Inzlicht, M., & Aglioti, S.M. (2024). Cortex, 171, 435-464.
Viewing entries tagged
neuroscience
Saunders, B., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). International Journal of Psychophysiology, 162, 112-120.
Frömer, R., Lin, H., Dean Wolf, C.K., Inzlicht, M., & Shenhav, A. (2021). Nature Communications, 12, 1230.
Saunders, B., & Inzlicht, M. (2020). International Journal of Psychophysiology, 155, 87-98.
Inzlicht, M. (2019). Cortex, 113, 360-362.
Elkins-Brown N., Saunders, B., & Inzlicht, M. (2018). Cortex, 109, 124-140.
Saunders, B., Riesel, A., Klawohn, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2018). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1066-1077.
Lin, H., Saunders, B., Hutcherson, C.A., & Inzlicht, M. (2018). NeuroImage.
* Download Supplemental Materials
Berkman, E.T., Hutcherson, C.A., Livingston, J.L., Kahn, L.E., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 422-428.
Saunders, B., Lin, H., Milyavskaya, M., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). International Journal of Psychophysiology, 119, 31-40.
Hobson, N.M., Gino, F., Norton, M.I., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). Psychological Science, 28, 733-750.
Hobson, N.M., Bonk, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). PeerJ, 5, e3363.
Randles, D., Kam, J.W.Y., Heine, S.J., Inzlicht, M., & Handy, T.C. (2016). Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11, 899-906.
Tritt, S.M., Peterson, J.B., Page-Gould, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). Emotion, 16, 1172-1185.
*Download Open Data and Materials
Hobson, N.M., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 11, 1698-1706
Harmon-Jones, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). In E. Harmon-Jones & M. Inzlicht (Eds.), Social Neuroscience: Biological Perspectives on Social Psychology (pp. 1-9). New York: Routledge.
Tags: social neuroscience, neuroscience
Inzlicht, M., Berkman, E., & Elkins-Brown, N. (2016). In E. Harmon-Jones & M. Inzlicht (Eds.), Social Neuroscience: Biological Approaches to Social Psychology (pp. 101-123). New York: Routledge.
Saunders, B., Rodrigo, A. H., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 93-105.
* Download Open Data and Materials
Elkins-Brown, Saunders, B., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). Psychophysiology, 53, 159-170. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12556
* Download Open Data and Materials
Saunders, B., He, F.F.H., & Inzlicht, M. (2015). PLOS One, 10(12): e0143312. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143312
* Download Open Data and Materials
Saunders, B., Milyavskaya, M., & Inzlicht, M. (2015). Psychophysiology, 52, 1205-1217.
Tullett, A. M., Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., & Inzlicht, M. (2015). Psychophysiology, 52, 990–996.
Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D., & Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.004.
Tullett, A.M., Kay, A., & Inzlicht, M. (2015). Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 10, 628-635.
Good, M., Inzlicht, M., & Larson, M.J. (2015). Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 10, 357-363. doi:10.1093/scan/nsu096
Xu, X., & Inzlicht, M. (2015). International Journal of Psychophysiology, 95, 247-253.
Hobson, N. M., Saunders, B., Al-Khindi, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2014). Emotion, 14, 1014-1026.
Nash, K. N., Prentice, M., Hirsh, J. B., McGregor, I. D., & Inzlicht, M. (2014). Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 9, 1239-1245. doi:10.1093/scan/nst099
Tritt, S M., Page-Gould, E., Peterson, J. B., & Inzlicht, M. (2014). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1004-1010. doi:10.1037/a0035179
Teper, R., & Inzlicht, M. (2014). Emotion, 14, 105- 114. doi:10.1037/a0034296
Hogeveen, J., Inzlicht, M., & Obhi, S. S. (2014). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 755-762. doi:10.1037/a0033477
Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2014). In H. van Trijp. (Ed.). Encouraging Sustainable Behavior: Psychology and the Environment (pp.137-153). London: Psychology Press.
Tags: neuroscience
Legault, L., & Inzlicht, M. (2013). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 123-138. doi:10.1037/a0030426
Proudfit, G. H., Inzlicht, M., & Mennin, D. (2013). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 636. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00636
Teper, R., & Inzlicht, M. (2013). Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 8, 85-92. doi:10.1093/scan/nss045.
Brown, K. W., Goodman, R, &, Inzlicht, M. (2013). Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 8, 93-99. doi:10.1093/scan/nss004
Gutsell, J.N., & Inzlicht, M. (2013). In B. Derks, D. Scheepers and N. Ellemers (Eds.). The Neuroscience of Prejudice (pp. 278-298). London: Psychology Press.
Tullett, A., Prentice, M., Nash, K., Teper, R., Inzlicht, M., & McGregor, I. (2013). In K. Markman, T. Proulx, & M. Linberg (Eds.). The Psychology of Meaning (pp. 401-419). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Inzlicht, M., & Al-Khindi, T. (2012). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 799-807. doi: 10.1037/a0027586.
Legault, L., Al-Khindi, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Psychological Science, 23, 1455-1460. doi:10.1177/0956797612448483.
Tullett, A. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Psychophysiology, 49, 1145-1153. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01395.x.
Nash, K., Inzlicht, M., & McGregor, I. D. (2012). Biological Psychology, 91, 96-102. doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.005.
Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 7, 596-603. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr035
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., & Good, M. (2011). Religion, Brain, & Behavior, 1, 192-212.
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A. M., & Good, M. (2011). Religion, Brain, & Behavior, 1, 244-251.
Phills, C.E., Kawakami, K., Tabi, E., Nadolny, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 197-210.
Inzlicht, M, & Tullett, A. M. (2010). Psychological Science, 21, 1184-1190.
Nash, K., McGregor, I., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). Psychophysiology. 47, 979–983.
Tags: alpha asymmetry, neuroscience
Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 841-845.
Hirsh, J. B., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). Psychophysiology, 47, 192-196.
Kang, S. K., Inzlicht, M., & Derks, B. (2010). Journal of Social Issues, 66, 585-601.
Tags: neuroscience, methods
Inzlicht, M., McGregor, I., Hirsh, J. B., & Nash, K. (2009). Psychological Science, 20, 385-392.
McGregor, I., Nash, K., & Inzlicht, M. (2009). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1003-1007.
Hirsh, J. B., & Inzlicht, M. (2008). Psychological Science, 19, 962-967.
Derks, B., Inzlicht, M., & Kang, S. (2008). Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 163-181.
Inzlicht, M. & Gutsell, J. N. (2007). Psychological Science, 18, 933-937.
Filter By Keyword
- neuroscience
- self-control
- emotion
- ego depletion
- motivation
- cognitive control
- ERN
- anterior cingulate cortex
- prejudice
- effort
- stigma
- empathy
- stereotype threat
- replication
- meaning
- self-regulation
- uncertainty
- decision making
- meta science
- religion
- education
- experience sampling
- morality
- acceptance
- fatigue
- cognitive dissonance
- mindfulness
- political psychology
- emotion regulation
- prosociality
Latest Tweets
News
Featured
Researchers conducted experiments to investigate the psychological effects of flicking by and fast-forwarding through online videos during moments of downtime
Scrolling through videos on TikTok or YouTube to avert boredom may have a decidedly unintended consequence: It can make people feel more bored, according to the paradoxical findings of a recent study published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. People seem increasingly intolerant of it, and Michael Inzlicht has a counterintuitive tip for avoiding boredom: Lean into it. Sit with the discomfort of boredom for a bit before flitting to something else. “If we’re so addicted to escaping boredom, so intolerant of boredom, it would be like a foraging animal going tree to tree, but never searching long enough to see if it bears fruit,” Inzlicht said. “Eventually, that animal will die.”
The struggle for self-control is real, and one many of us are familiar with - but is 'willpower' actually a myth? Psychology professor Michael Inzlicht has long been intrigued by how we curb our less desirable behaviours, and what it is that unites people with 'high self-control'. His research at the University of Toronto's Work and Play Lab also seeks to understand our complicated relationship with effort and empathy - and whether so-called 'empathetic AI' has a place in our future.
Collaborators
- Joshua Aronson, New York University
- Avi Ben-Zeev, San Francisco State University
- Elliot Berkman, University of Oregon
- Kirk Brown, Virginia Commonwealth University
- Daryl Cameron, Penn State University
- Belle Derks, Utrecht University
- Jennifer Gutsell, Brandeis University
- Greg Hajcak, Florida State University
- Eddie Harmon-Jones, University of New South Wales
- Jacob Hirsh, University of Toronto
- Cendri Hutcherson, University of Toronto
- Sonia Kang, University of Toronto
- Michael Larson, Brigham Young University
- Lisa Legault, Clarkson University
- Ian McGregor, University of Waterloo
- Marina Milyavskaya, Carleton University
- Sukhvinder Obhi, McMaster University
- Liz Page-Gould, University of Toronto
- Travis Proulx, Cardiff University
- Blair Saunders, University of Dundee
- Brandon Schmeichel, Texas A&M University
- Zindel Segal, University of Toronto
- Alexa Tullett, University of Alabama
University of Toronto
Organizations
- Association for Psychological Science
- Canadian Psychological Association
- Canada Foundation for Innovation
- International Social Cognition Network
- International Society for Research on Emotion
- National Academy of Education
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Social and Affective Neuroscience Society
- Social Psychology Network
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
- Society for Personality and Social Psychology
- Society for Psychophysiological Research
- Spencer Foundation
…This isn’t a relic of a bygone era. The idea that marijuana makes you lazy has been a recurring theme in anti-drug campaigns and remains a widely held belief. Many people still view cannabis users as unmotivated slackers, content to waste their days in a haze of smoke. But is this really true? According to recent research published in Social Psychological and Personality Science, it may be little more than a myth.
Read Here