Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 450-463. doi:10.1177/1745691612454134
* Winner of 2012 ISCON Best Social Cognition Paper Award
Viewing entries in
2012
Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 450-463. doi:10.1177/1745691612454134
* Winner of 2012 ISCON Best Social Cognition Paper Award
Inzlicht, M., & Al-Khindi, T. (2012). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 799-807. doi: 10.1037/a0027586.
Legault, L., Al-Khindi, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Psychological Science, 23, 1455-1460. doi:10.1177/0956797612448483.
Proulx, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Psychological Inquiry, 23, 317-335.
Proulx, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Psychological Inquiry, 23, 386-396.
Tritt, S. M., Inzlicht, M., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2012). Social Cognition, 6, 715-733.
Tullett, A. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Psychophysiology, 49, 1145-1153. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01395.x.
Nash, K., Inzlicht, M., & McGregor, I. D. (2012). Biological Psychology, 91, 96-102. doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.005.
Proulx, T., Inzlicht, M., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2012). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 285-291.
Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 7, 596-603. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr035
Kang, S. K., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 357-369.
Inzlicht, M., Gutsell, J. N., & Legault, L. (2012). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 361-365.
Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2012). In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.).Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (pp. 3-14). New York: Oxford University Press.
Inzlicht, M., Tullett, A., & Gutsell, J. N. (2012). In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.). Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (pp. 107-123). New York: Oxford University Press.
‘People would rather shock themselves than spend 15 minutes alone with their thoughts’ — could you handle the ‘bed rotting’ trend?
Over the past few years, wellness advocates have championed “niksen” (the Dutch art of doing nothing) as an antidote to burnout. Before that, we had il dolce far niente, a 200-plus-year-old Italian phrase that refers to the pleasures of doing nothing: a romantic concept that enjoyed a little comeback when it was name-checked in the 2010 movie “Eat, Pray, Love.” “Actually doing nothing is something a lot of people find aversive,” explained Michael Inzlicht, a professor in the University of Toronto’s department of psychology. “People associate doing nothing with boredom, which is an emotion most people try to avoid.”
Every strenuous exercise involves some mixture of suffering and pleasure. The key to sticking with it is getting the balance right
“People avoid effort, but it’s also something that we can learn to like,” said Michael Inzlicht, a colleague of Dr. Bloom’s at the University of Toronto. In addition to pleasure, humans seek out things like competence, mastery and self-understanding. “You can’t get those without pushing yourself,” he said.
It might seem strange that AI can even attempt to offer this kind of assistance. But millions of people are already turning to ChatGPT and specialist therapy chatbots, which offer convenient and inexpensive mental health support. Even doctors are purportedly using AI to help. Some experts say this is a boon. After all, AI, unhindered by embarrassment and burnout, might be able to express empathy more openly and tirelessly than humans. “We praise empathetic AI,” one group of psychology researchers recently wrote.
Read More