Randles, D., Kam, J.W.Y., Heine, S.J., Inzlicht, M., & Handy, T.C. (2016). Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11, 899-906.
Viewing entries in
2016
Tritt, S.M., Peterson, J.B., Page-Gould, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). Emotion, 16, 1172-1185.
*Download Open Data and Materials
Hobson, N.M., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 11, 1698-1706
Francis, Z., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). In E. Hirt (Ed.), Self-Regulation and Ego Control (pp.373-398). New York: Elsevier.
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N.L.D., Alberts, H., Anggono, C.O., Batailler, C., Birt, A., Brand, R., Brandt, M.J., Brewer, G., Bruyneel, S., Calvillo, D.P., Campbell, W.K., Cannon, P.R., Carlucci, M., Carruth, N., Cheung, T., Crowell, A., De Ridder, D.T.D., Dewitte, S., Elson, M., Evans, J.R., Fay, B.A., Fennis, B.M., Finley, A., Francis, Z., Heise, E., Hoemann, H., Inzlicht, M., Koole, S.L., Koppel, L., Kroese, F., Lange, F., Lau, K., Lynch, B.P., Martijn, C., Merckelbach, H., Mills, N.V., Miyake, A., Mosser, A.E., Muise, M., Muller, D., Muzi, M., Nalis, D., Nurwanti, R., Otgaar, H., Philipp, M., Primoceri, P., Rentzsch, K., Ringos, L., Schlinkert, C., Schmeichel, B.J., Schoch, S.F., Schrama, M., Schütz, A., Stamos, A., Tinghög, G., Ullrich, J., vanDellen, M., Wimbarti, S., Wolff, W. Yusainy, C., Zerhouni, O., Zweinenberg, M. (2016). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 546-573.
* Download Supplemental Online Materials
Inzlicht, M., & Marcora, S.M. (2016). Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 656.
Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2016). In K. Vohs & R. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 165-181) (3rd edition). New York: Guilford Press.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). In E. Harmon-Jones & M. Inzlicht (Eds.), Social Neuroscience: Biological Perspectives on Social Psychology (pp. 1-9). New York: Routledge.
Tags: social neuroscience, neuroscience
Inzlicht, M., Berkman, E., & Elkins-Brown, N. (2016). In E. Harmon-Jones & M. Inzlicht (Eds.), Social Neuroscience: Biological Approaches to Social Psychology (pp. 101-123). New York: Routledge.
Saunders, B., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). In T. Braver (Ed.), Motivation and Cognitive Control (pp. 211-234). New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
Hobson, N.M., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 30-31
Saunders, B., Rodrigo, A. H., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 93-105.
* Download Open Data and Materials
Elkins-Brown, Saunders, B., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). Psychophysiology, 53, 159-170. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12556
* Download Open Data and Materials
Filter By Keyword
- neuroscience
- self-control
- emotion
- ego depletion
- motivation
- cognitive control
- ERN
- anterior cingulate cortex
- prejudice
- effort
- stigma
- empathy
- stereotype threat
- replication
- meaning
- self-regulation
- uncertainty
- decision making
- meta science
- religion
- education
- experience sampling
- morality
- acceptance
- fatigue
- cognitive dissonance
- mindfulness
- political psychology
- emotion regulation
- prosociality
Latest Tweets
News
Featured
Researchers conducted experiments to investigate the psychological effects of flicking by and fast-forwarding through online videos during moments of downtime
Scrolling through videos on TikTok or YouTube to avert boredom may have a decidedly unintended consequence: It can make people feel more bored, according to the paradoxical findings of a recent study published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. People seem increasingly intolerant of it, and Michael Inzlicht has a counterintuitive tip for avoiding boredom: Lean into it. Sit with the discomfort of boredom for a bit before flitting to something else. “If we’re so addicted to escaping boredom, so intolerant of boredom, it would be like a foraging animal going tree to tree, but never searching long enough to see if it bears fruit,” Inzlicht said. “Eventually, that animal will die.”
The struggle for self-control is real, and one many of us are familiar with - but is 'willpower' actually a myth? Psychology professor Michael Inzlicht has long been intrigued by how we curb our less desirable behaviours, and what it is that unites people with 'high self-control'. His research at the University of Toronto's Work and Play Lab also seeks to understand our complicated relationship with effort and empathy - and whether so-called 'empathetic AI' has a place in our future.
Collaborators
- Joshua Aronson, New York University
- Avi Ben-Zeev, San Francisco State University
- Elliot Berkman, University of Oregon
- Kirk Brown, Virginia Commonwealth University
- Daryl Cameron, Penn State University
- Belle Derks, Utrecht University
- Jennifer Gutsell, Brandeis University
- Greg Hajcak, Florida State University
- Eddie Harmon-Jones, University of New South Wales
- Jacob Hirsh, University of Toronto
- Cendri Hutcherson, University of Toronto
- Sonia Kang, University of Toronto
- Michael Larson, Brigham Young University
- Lisa Legault, Clarkson University
- Ian McGregor, University of Waterloo
- Marina Milyavskaya, Carleton University
- Sukhvinder Obhi, McMaster University
- Liz Page-Gould, University of Toronto
- Travis Proulx, Cardiff University
- Blair Saunders, University of Dundee
- Brandon Schmeichel, Texas A&M University
- Zindel Segal, University of Toronto
- Alexa Tullett, University of Alabama
University of Toronto
Organizations
- Association for Psychological Science
- Canadian Psychological Association
- Canada Foundation for Innovation
- International Social Cognition Network
- International Society for Research on Emotion
- National Academy of Education
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Social and Affective Neuroscience Society
- Social Psychology Network
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
- Society for Personality and Social Psychology
- Society for Psychophysiological Research
- Spencer Foundation
…This isn’t a relic of a bygone era. The idea that marijuana makes you lazy has been a recurring theme in anti-drug campaigns and remains a widely held belief. Many people still view cannabis users as unmotivated slackers, content to waste their days in a haze of smoke. But is this really true? According to recent research published in Social Psychological and Personality Science, it may be little more than a myth.
Read Here